The Little Known History of Fluoride A Behind-the-Scenes Look at a 20th-Century Achievement in Science and Health

chapter 2

Let's get clear what tooth decay really is ... and was

CDC declared fluoridation to be one of the 10 great public health achievements in the 20th century.

Because, before we had fluoride, tooth decay was incredibly bad.

Let's look at what CDC said about how bad tooth decay was before fluoride ... with a deeper, behind-the-scenes look at four classic studies from dental history.

Trail style graphic
On this page, we'll look at the first few things CDC had to say about tooth decay back in the day ...
Trail style graphic
... and the first three of those four papers.
Trail style graphic
1
"AT THE BEGINNING OF THE 20TH CENTURY, EXTENSIVE DENTAL CARIES WAS COMMON IN THE UNITED STATES AND IN MOST DEVELOPED COUNTRIES. NO EFFECTIVE MEASURES EXISTED FOR PREVENTING THIS DISEASE, AND THE MOST FREQUENT TREATMENT WAS TOOTH EXTRACTION."

CDC wrote the above and cited a classic review paper, titled "Influences for change in the dental health status of populations: an historical perspective."

Published in the Journal of Public Health Dentistry in 1978, this paper was written by one of the most hard-working and prolific oral health epidemiologists in the country ...

Dr. Brian A. Burt A professor in the School of Public Health & the School of Dentistry at the University of Michigan for over 30 years
Brian Burt dental public health
Michigan Ann Arbor hand map
(Are we going to bring out the hand map every time we talk about Michigan? Yes. Yes, we are.)

At the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, they don't do anything half-ass ...

You want ivy on a quaint historic university building? Done. Building covered in ivy.

You want football? Bam. Biggest stadium in the U.S.

You want band geeks? You got it. Over 300 of them marching at half-time.

At the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, they don't do anything half-ass ...

Michigan Ann Arbor hand map
(Are we going to bring out the hand map every time we talk about Michigan? Yes. Yes, we are.)

You want ivy on a quaint historic university building? Done. Building covered in ivy.

You want football? Bam. Biggest stadium in the U.S.

You want band geeks? You got it. Over 300 of them marching at half-time.

And if you want oral health epidemiology?

Look no further than Professor Emeritus Brian A. Burt's 17-page C.V. ... listing over 120 peer-reviewed journal publications, nearly 20 books and book chapters, 65 published abstracts, 10 technical reports, and over 25 years serving on the World Health Organization's expert advisory panel on oral health.

Brian Burt CV

The paper CDC cited in the Ten Great Public Health Achievements review was Dr. Burt's 17th peer-reviewed science article and one of at least three dozen papers he had written over the course of his career that focused on fluoride effects on teeth.

In this paper, he gave a broad review of the history of tooth decay and loss in the United States, Britain, New Zealand, and other Western nations. He examined how prevalent it was to lose teeth to cavities and use extraction as a treatment in these countries during the early and middle parts of the 20th century. And he explored a wide variety of factors that influence tooth loss.

Reflecting on and reviewing influences well beyond cavities and fluoride, he also discussed socioeconomic status, cultural attitudes, patterns in dietary consumption of sugar, the oral healthcare delivery system, and availability of and attitudes towards dental care and prevention – among patients as well as among dentists.

Brian Burt CV
% edentulous in 1971 Age
51% of Americans over 55 in 1971 were edentulous (toothless!)
Graph illustrating fluoride effects on teeth and problem with percent edentulous before fluoride

One of the most striking statistics from the data that Dr. Burt reviewed? In 1971, over half of American adults who were older than 55 were missing all of their teeth.

That high amount of toothlessness reflects the prevalence of cavities and extractions that generation experienced throughout the early 1900s ... before research in the 1930s and 1940s, on the effects of fluoride and fluoridation, ushered in a brand-new and effective approach of prevention. An approach that used not only fluoride but a wide variety of science-based tools and methods.

Fluoridation, fluoride toothpaste, fluoride supplements, fluoride mouth rinses, better dental care for kids, and more personal preventive-focused dentistry – they all went hand-in-hand to create what Dr. Burt called a "preventive movement."

2 & 3
"FAILURE TO MEET THE MINIMUM STANDARD OF SIX OPPOSING TEETH WAS A LEADING CAUSE OF REJECTION FROM MILITARY SERVICE IN BOTH WORLD WARS."

CDC gave two citations for this statement about how bad tooth decay was among American recruits in World War 1 and World War 2. The first was on World War 1 data:

Rollo Britten and George St. J. Perrott, 1941. Summary of physical findings on men drafted in the world war.

A statistician Data and statistics icons
& his boss Boss icon
from ... the Division of Public Health Methods at the National Institute of Health reported on
Britten and Perrot 1941 paper on physicals of recruits in WW1
What they found

LEADING CAUSES OF REJECTION FROM GENERAL MILITARY SERVICE IN WORLD WAR 1:

  1. Defective vision
  2. Flat feet
  3. Underweight
The fourth leading cause of rejection from service in WW1 was defective and deficient teeth
Dental exams of soldiers arriving for duty at U.S. Army Base Hospital No. 45 (Medical College of Virginia) in WW1.
The second paper was on World War 2 recruits: "The dental status and dental needs of young adult males, rejectable, or acceptable for military service, according to selective service dental requirements" published in 1941, by Henry Klein.
Dr. Henry Klein Dental officer of the Public Health Service back in the day
Head shot of Dr. Henry Klein
worked with Assistant Dental Surgeon John Cody to examine 21- to 35-year-old men from Maryland and West Virginia
1941 paper by Klein on the dental health of young men in America
Picture of a dental exam being conducted in the field during World War 2
This is not Assistant Dental Surgeon John Cody examining a young man from Maryland or West Virginia. But this is a military dentist examining a soldier during WW2. Also, we think this is an excellent example of why Hollywood loves to make movies with WW2 soldiers as characters. Our boys were photogenic ;) ... even when they were missing so many teeth!
The second paper was on World War 2 recruits: "The dental status and dental needs of young adult males, rejectable, or acceptable for military service, according to selective service dental requirements" published in 1941, by Henry Klein.
Dr. Henry Klein Dental officer of the Public Health Service back in the day
Head shot of Dr. Henry Klein
worked with Assistant Dental Surgeon John Cody to examine 21- to 35-year-old men from Maryland and West Virginia
What did Drs. Klein and Cody find?
15 OF EVERY 100 YOUNG MEN COULD NOT MEET THE MILITARY'S STANDARD FOR GENERAL SERVICE
And what was that standard again?
6 PAIRS OF OPPOSING TEETH
* 3 PAIRS OF OPPOSING FRONT TEETH * 3 PAIRS OF OPPOSING BACK TEETH
OK, but what does that really mean?
THAT MEANS THAT THIS GUY WAS CONSIDERED READY FOR DUTY
Illustration of dental health standard for service during World War 2, 6 pairs of teeth. Shows a big smile missing many teeth on a stereotypical 1940s happy guy with army hat.
More surprising dental history facts from Dr. Klein's & Cody's classic paper:

On average, 21-year-olds had 5 teeth with cavities needing fillings.

Tooth icon with words: 5 teeth with cavities

One-third of the men had at least one tooth which was so decayed that it couldn't even be filled and needed to be pulled instead.

Icon of dental extraction tool and statistic one-third needed extractions

84% of the men needed bridges, partial dentures, or full dentures.
84% of 21- to 35-year-olds in their study needed dental prosthetics that today we generally associate with old age.
Even among the men who met the minimum standard of 6 opposing teeth,
9 out of 10 of them needed a bridge or partial denture ... at ages 21 through 35.

Icon of a partial denture with statistic 84% needed dentures or bridges
More pictures of dentistry and recruiting during WW2.
WW2 dental exam Letterman Army Medical Center
World War 2 dentistry
WW2 African-American recruits
WW2 recruit being weighed by a health practitioner
Dental exams in barracks-like building during World War 2